|
The design of oil and gas production
systems, which includes a gas compression system,
requires careful analysis to ensure that the effect of
changing reservoir pressures, variable operating
conditions and production rates are fully taken into
account. This is because the declining pressures affect
the capacity and performance of pipelines and processing
facilities differently from that of a gas compression
system.
The design of pipelines and
processing facilities (e.g. separators, coolers and TEG
systems) are based on "peak flow rates" achieved
during the "plateau period", when there is no
spare capacity in the system. However, as the reservoir
pressure declines and enters the "post plateau period",
the production rate decreases when the processing
facilities and pipelines have spare capacity.

On the other hand, the gas compressors have spare
capacity at the start and operate satisfactorily during
the "plateau period", because the gas pressures and gas
densities are higher - when compressors require less
power, head and lower flow capacity. As the reservoir
pressures decline during the "post plateau period", the
compression power, the (volumetric) flow capacity and
the head required increases sharply above the original
design; the real production capacity of the system
becomes "negative" and compressors become the
bottleneck.

Dr Akhtar, MSE's founder, recognised
the mismatch between the design of processing facilities
and the compression systems at the very start and has
been involved in the re-design of compressors and
processing facilities since its inception. MSE found
that the commonly available technologies and software
systems were good at designing the processing facilities
and pipelines but failed to simulate the effect of
varying pressures on gas compressor design and their
operations. This shortcoming lead to too many compressor
and engine failures, apparently caused by a range of
problems such as pressure instabilities i.e. surging of
compressors, high vibrations and high gas discharge
temperatures etc. These failures could not be rectified
by the conventional troubleshooting techniques or
replacement of the parts and needed a completely
different approach; a redesign of the compression
system. |









 |